Jon B. Dubrow

Subscribe to Jon B. Dubrow's Posts
Jon Dubrow is co-head of McDermott’s Antitrust Mergers Focus Group and is a strategic advisor serving clients across a host of inter-related antitrust issues, including mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions / merger clearance, counseling and litigation. Jon leads the defense of mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures before the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and other international competition authorities. He also regularly assists third parties whose interests are adversely affected by proposed transactions. Jon also is experienced in antitrust litigation. He provides counseling on distribution issues, contracting arrangements and a wide variety of other competition-related matters. Read Jon Dubrow's full bio.

Antitrust M&A Snapshot | Regulator Focus on High-Tech Transactions, Acquisitions and Impact on Innovations


By , , , and on Mar 11, 2019
Posted In DOJ Developments, EC Developments, FTC Developments, German Developments, Joint Ventures/Competitor Collaboration, Mergers & Acquisitions

Antitrust regulators in the United States and Europe were very active in the final quarter of 2018 closing a large number of cases requiring in-depth investigations. In the United States, regulators continue their focus on the potential need to update their methods of reviewing high-tech transactions with public hearings on the future of antitrust enforcement....

Continue Reading



Out of Bounds: Sports Agencies Flagged for Anticompetitive Bidding Agreements


By and on Feb 27, 2019
Posted In Cartel Enforcement, DOJ Developments, Joint Ventures/Competitor Collaboration, Mergers & Acquisitions

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) recently sued former joint venture partners because they allegedly coordinated their competitive activities beyond the legitimate scope of their venture. This case illustrates several important points. First, companies who collaborate through joint ventures and similar arrangements need to be mindful that any legitimate collaborative activity does not “spill over”...

Continue Reading



Aerospace & Defense Series: Antitrust Risks for Aerospace and Defense Contractors in Employment Practices


By on Feb 19, 2019
Posted In Cartel Enforcement, DOJ Developments, FTC Developments, Private Litigation

As highlighted in a recent lawsuit, aerospace and defense contractors can face various antitrust risks when using certain tactics to prevent other companies from hiring their employees. See Hunter v. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp., No. 2:19-CV-411 (S.D. Ohio). The plaintiff, a former intelligence professional who worked at the US government’s Joint Intelligence Operations Center...

Continue Reading



THE LATEST: FTC Allows Problematic Vertical Merger to Proceed with a Behavioral Remedy


By and on Feb 5, 2019
Posted In DOJ Developments, FTC Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions

On January 28, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it had accepted a proposed settlement with office supply distributors Staples and Essendant in connection with Staples’ proposed $482.7 million acquisition of Essendant. The settlement suggests that the FTC is currently more willing than the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to accept conduct remedies...

Continue Reading



New FTC Interpretation Will Require HSR Act Filing for Many Hospital Affiliation Transactions


By , and on Nov 20, 2018
Posted In FTC Developments, Healthcare Antitrust, Mergers & Acquisitions

The Premerger Notification Office (PNO) of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently formalized a new position on Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR Act) reporting obligations for certain not-for-profit, non-stock transactions. The change is currently in effect and applies to transactions that have not yet closed. The change in position will require reporting of many hospital transactions that...

Continue Reading



Antitrust M&A Snapshot


By , and on Nov 7, 2018
Posted In DOJ Developments, EC Developments, EU Developments, FTC Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Monopolization/Abuse of Dominance

United States: July – September 2018 Update Both US antitrust agencies marked the third quarter of 2018 with significant policy announcements regarding the merger review process. The announced reforms seek to expedite the review process through cooperation between the agencies and the merging parties. Moving first, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) revealed a Model Timing...

Continue Reading



DOJ Announces Procedural Reforms Seeking to Resolve Merger Investigations within 6 Months of Filing


By , and on Sep 25, 2018
Posted In DOJ Developments, FTC Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions

Today, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim announced a series of reforms with the express goal to resolve most merger investigations within six months of filing. The reforms seek to place the burden of faster reviews not only on the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), but also on the merging parties. The DOJ will...

Continue Reading



THE LATEST: FTC Announces New Model Timing Agreement for Merger Investigations


By on Aug 9, 2018
Posted In FTC Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions

WHAT HAPPENED: On August 7, the FTC published a new Model Timing Agreement. Timing agreements are agreements between FTC staff and merging parties that outline the FTC’s expected timing for various events in order for it to conduct an orderly investigation during a Second Request. The FTC expects the Model Timing Agreement to be used...

Continue Reading



Antitrust M&A Snapshot


By , and on Aug 6, 2018
Posted In DOJ Developments, EC Developments, EU Developments, FTC Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions, Monopolization/Abuse of Dominance

United States: April – June 2018 Update The second quarter of 2018 ushered in a trial defeat for the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the beginning of a new era at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). In June, Judge Richard J. Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia denied the...

Continue Reading



Three Lessons from AT&T/Time Warner and Three Strategies for Future Vertical Transactions


By , and on Jun 19, 2018
Posted In DOJ Developments, Mergers & Acquisitions

The challenges that the government faces in litigating vertical mergers was illustrated in the DOJ’s recent loss in its challenge of AT&T’s proposed acquisition of Time Warner. The result provides guidance for how companies can improve their odds of obtaining antitrust approval for similar transactions. Access the full article.

Continue Reading



BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Ranked In Chambers USA 2022
US Leading Firm 2022